« Back to Assessment Instruments
Qualitative/Quantitative:
Type of Instrument:
Number of Items:
22Subscale Information:
PRISM Context Assessment: 6
RE-AIM Program Outcome Assessment: 16Language Availability:
Brief Description:
The iPRISM webtool was designed to assess and guide a program’s (a) alignment with context, (b) progress on pragmatic outcomes, (c) potential adaptations, and (d) future sustainability across the stages of the implementation lifecycle.Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Trinkley, K. E., Glasgow, R. E., D'Mello, S., Fort, M. P., Ford, B., & Rabin, B. A. (2023). The iPRISM webtool: an interactive tool to pragmatically guide the iterative use of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model in public health and clinical settings. Implementation science communications, 4(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00494-4. PMID: 37726860 PMCID: PMC10508024Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Johnson, J. K., Sullivan, J. L., Trinkley, K. E., Lapin, B., Passek, S., Asp, V., Ford, B., & Rabin, B. A. (2024). Use of the iPRISM webtool in a learning community to assess implementation context and fit of a novel clinical decision support tool for physical therapy triage in acute care hospitals. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 10.1002/pmrj.13204. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13204. PMID: 38934486.Website:
Attachments:
Version:
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
- Qualitative
- Quantitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
- Periodic Reflection
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
22Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
PRISM Context Assessment: 6RE-AIM Program Outcome Assessment: 16
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
- English
- Spanish
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
The iPRISM webtool was designed to assess and guide a program’s (a) alignment with context, (b) progress on pragmatic outcomes, (c) potential adaptations, and (d) future sustainability across the stages of the implementation lifecycle.Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Trinkley, K. E., Glasgow, R. E., D'Mello, S., Fort, M. P., Ford, B., & Rabin, B. A. (2023). The iPRISM webtool: an interactive tool to pragmatically guide the iterative use of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model in public health and clinical settings. Implementation science communications, 4(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00494-4. PMID: 37726860 PMCID: PMC10508024Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Johnson, J. K., Sullivan, J. L., Trinkley, K. E., Lapin, B., Passek, S., Asp, V., Ford, B., & Rabin, B. A. (2024). Use of the iPRISM webtool in a learning community to assess implementation context and fit of a novel clinical decision support tool for physical therapy triage in acute care hospitals. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 10.1002/pmrj.13204. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13204. PMID: 38934486.Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Attachments:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Implementation Science Considerations
- Acceptability/feasibility
- Adaptation and evolution
- Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics
- Barriers and facilitators
- Communication
- Complexity
- Context – Inner setting
- Cost
- Health Equity
- Innovation characteristics
- Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis
- Maintenance and Sustainability
- Outcomes – Health/QOL/Satisfaction/Clinical
- Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change
- Patient/target audience characteristics and needs
- Readiness
- Stakeholders
- ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
- Active Implementation Framework
- Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- Advancing health disparities research within the health care system
- Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
- Behaviour Change Wheel
- Blueprint for Dissemination
- CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
- Caledonian Practice Development Model
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework For The Comparative Analysis of Policy Change
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization
- Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
- Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework
- Coordinated Implementation Model
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
- Designing and evaluating interventions to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care
- Diffusion of Innovation
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
- Dynamic Sustainability Framework
- EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
- EQ-DI Framework
- Effective Dissemination Strategies
- Evidence Integration Triangle
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Analyzing Adoption of Complex Health Innovations
- Framework for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Policy
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- Framework for Knowledge Translation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for Translating Evidence into Action
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Generic Implementation Framework
- Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Research Center Framework
- Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Interactive Systems Framework
- Intervention Mapping
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
- Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- Linking Systems Framework
- Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
- Model for Improving the Dissemination of Nursing Research
- Model for Locally Based Research Transfer Development
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Normalization Process Theory
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- Ottawa Model of Research Use
- OutPatient Treatment in Ontario Services (OPTIONS) Model
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2
- Precede-Proceed Model
- Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
- Proctor's Implementation Outcomes
- Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)
- Pronovost's 4E's Process Theory
- Push-Pull Capacity Model
- RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
- RE-AIM 1.0 Framework
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Real-World Dissemination
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Research Development Dissemination and Utilization Framework
- Research Knowledge Infrastructure
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- Stetler Model of Research Utilization
- Sticky Knowledge
- Stirman framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions
- Streams of Policy Process
- Technology Transfer Model
- The SPIRIT Action Framework
- Theoretical Domains Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Translational Framework for Public Health Research
- Translational Research Framework to Address Health Disparities
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)
- Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework
- Weiner organizational readiness
- conNECT Framework
- Adoption
- Effectiveness
- Implementation
- Reach
- Sustainment
- Not Found
- Pre-Implementation
- Implementation
- Sustainment
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)Theories, Models, Frameworks Assessed:
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessedImplementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomesImplementation Strategies:
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrumentPhase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Intended Focus
- Individual (Patient, Community Member)
- Implementer
- Organizational
- Community
- System
- Policy
- Community Members/Patients
- Researcher/Evaluator
- Clinician
- Administrator
- Public Health Practitioner
- Teacher/Trainer
- Employer
- Clinical Outpatient
- Clinical Inpatient
- Residential Care
- Community Organization
- Public Health Agency
- School
- Workplace
Levels of Data Collection:
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects dataIntended Priority Population:
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrumentIntended Priority Setting:
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is usedPolicy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policyEquity Relevant:
YesAssessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
YesThe assessment instrument produces a composite scoreNorms:
YesMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample sizeResponsiveness:
YesThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).Validity:
Not FoundThe extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.Reliability:
Not FoundThe extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.Factor Analysis:
Not FoundA statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.
Pragmatic Properties
- Guidance to Administer
- Guidance to Analyze
- Guidance to Interpret
- Guidance for Action/Decision
- Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
- High: Observation and syncronous collection of data
- Generative Outcome
Time to Administer:
<30 minutesThe amount of time required to complete the assessment instrumentSecondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
FreeCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.Interpretation:
Not FoundExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.Training:
Not FoundExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reportedResources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)User Guidance:
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use dataObtrusiveness:
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)Interactivity:
Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.