« Back to Assessment Instruments
Qualitative/Quantitative:
Type of Instrument:
Number of Items:
39Subscale Information:
Relative Advantage (1) Compatibility (2) Simplicity (1) Ability to Pilot (2) Observability (3) Priority (3) Innovation-Specific Knowledge and Skills (3) Program Champion (3) Supportive Climate (3) Inter-Organizational Relationships (2) Intra-Organizational Relationships (2) Culture (1) Climate (1) Innovativeness (2) Resource Utilization (3) Leadership (1) Structure (3) Staff Capacity (3)Language Availability:
Brief Description:
This tool was originally designed to assist organizations whose initiatives were disrupted by COVID-19. However, the tool also is functional for organizations or communities whose existing initiatives have been impacted by other major disruption(s) or who are implementing new changes as a result of the disruption(s) (e.g., natural disasters, social disruptions, major reorganization). This tool should be used to assess organization’s or community’s readiness to implement a new or existing program in the context of the significant impacts of a major disruption(s).Website:
Instrument and/or related documentation:
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Not FoundCiting Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Not FoundVersion:
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Readiness for Recovery and Resiliency – Interview Guide
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
- Qualitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
The type of the assessment instrument
- Focus Group Interview
- Individual Interview
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
39
Number of items in the assessment instrument
Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Relative Advantage (1) Compatibility (2) Simplicity (1) Ability to Pilot (2) Observability (3) Priority (3) Innovation-Specific Knowledge and Skills (3) Program Champion (3) Supportive Climate (3) Inter-Organizational Relationships (2) Intra-Organizational Relationships (2) Culture (1) Climate (1) Innovativeness (2) Resource Utilization (3) Leadership (1) Structure (3) Staff Capacity (3)
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
- English
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
This tool was originally designed to assist organizations whose initiatives were disrupted by COVID-19. However, the tool also is functional for organizations or communities whose existing initiatives have been impacted by other major disruption(s) or who are implementing new changes as a result of the disruption(s) (e.g., natural disasters, social disruptions, major reorganization). This tool should be used to assess organization’s or community’s readiness to implement a new or existing program in the context of the significant impacts of a major disruption(s).
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Instrument and/or related documentation:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Not Found
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Not Found
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not Found
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Related Instruments:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Implementation Science Considerations
- Acceptability/feasibility
- Adoption
- Barriers and facilitators
- Champion/field agent
- Communication
- Communication channels
- Compatibility
- Complexity
- Context
- Context – Inner setting
- Context – Outer setting
- Cost
- Implementation
- Innovation characteristics
- Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis
- Observability
- Pre-implementation
- Readiness
- ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
- Active Implementation Framework
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- Advancing health disparities research within the health care system
- Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
- Behaviour Change Wheel
- Blueprint for Dissemination
- CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
- Caledonian Practice Development Model
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework For The Comparative Analysis of Policy Change
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization
- Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
- Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework
- Convergent Diffusion and Social Marketing Approach for Dissemination
- Coordinated Implementation Model
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
- Designing and evaluating interventions to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care
- Diffusion of Innovation
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
- Dynamic Sustainability Framework
- EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
- EQ-DI Framework
- Effective Dissemination Strategies
- Evidence Integration Triangle
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Analyzing Adoption of Complex Health Innovations
- Framework for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Policy
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- Framework for Knowledge Translation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for Translating Evidence into Action
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Generic Implementation Framework
- Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Research Center Framework
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Interactive Systems Framework
- Intervention Mapping
- Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
- Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- Linking Systems Framework
- Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
- Model for Improving the Dissemination of Nursing Research
- Model for Locally Based Research Transfer Development
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- OutPatient Treatment in Ontario Services (OPTIONS) Model
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2
- Precede-Proceed Model
- Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
- Proctor's Implementation Outcomes
- Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)
- Pronovost's 4E's Process Theory
- Push-Pull Capacity Model
- RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
- RE-AIM 1.0 Framework
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Real-World Dissemination
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Research Development Dissemination and Utilization Framework
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- Stetler Model of Research Utilization
- Sticky Knowledge
- Technology Transfer Model
- The SPIRIT Action Framework
- Theoretical Domains Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework
- Weiner organizational readiness
- conNECT Framework
- Acceptability
- Adoption
- Appropriateness
- Effectiveness
- Feasibility
- Implementation
- Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators
- Pre-Implementation
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
Implementation Strategies:
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Phase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Intended Focus
- Implementer
- Organizational
- Researcher/Evaluator
- Administrator
- Clinical Outpatient
- Clinical Inpatient
- Residential Care
- Community Organization
- Public Health Agency
- School
- Workplace
Levels of Data Collection:
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
Intended Priority Population:
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Intended Priority Setting:
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Policy:
Not Found
Assessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Relevant:
Yes
Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
No
The assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
Not Found
Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
Not Found
The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
Not Found
The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.
Reliability:
Not Found
The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.
Factor Analysis:
Not Found
A statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.
Pragmatic Properties
- Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
Time to Administer:
Not Found
The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
Free
Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)
Literacy:
Not Found
Readability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not Found
Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not Found
Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/Low
Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Not Found
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Obtrusiveness:
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
Interactivity:
Not Found
Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.