View by D&I Assessment Instruments

On this page, we provide an alphabetical listing of all D&I assessment instruments available in the webtool. You can sort the assessment instruments by name or the type of instrument. You can also search for assessment instruments by entering a keyword OR by selecting from the categories in the menu in the right sidebar.

Show Filters

Assessment Instrument	Qualitative / Quantitative	Type of Instrument	Language Availability	Related Constructs	Implementation Outcomes	Equity-Relevant	Phase of Implementation Process
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)	Quantitative	Survey	English, German	Acceptability/feasibility	Acceptability, Adoption	Yes	Implementation, Sustainment
AHRQ Digital Health Equity Framework	Qualitative	Checklist	English	Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Context – Outer setting Context – Inner setting Health Equity Patient/target audience characteristics and needs Outcomes Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change	Acceptability, Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Implementation, Reach, Sustainment	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT)	Quantitative	Survey	English, Spanish, Portuguese	Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Adaptation and evolution Readiness Stakeholders Sustainability	Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Implementation, Sustainment		Sustainment
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide (Lam)	Qualitative	Individual Interview	English	Evaluation Barriers and facilitators Innovation characteristics Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Process Stakeholders	Implementation	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide (Zhao)	Qualitative	Focus Group Interview Individual Interview	English	Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Barriers and facilitators Evaluation Innovation characteristics Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Process Stakeholders	Implementation	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide Webtool	Qualitative	Individual Interview	English, Portuguese, Chinese	Adaptation and evolution Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Barriers and facilitators Compatibility Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Engagement Evaluation Innovation characteristics Outcomes Process Readiness Stakeholders Strategies	Acceptability, Adaptation, Appropriateness, Fidelity, Implementation, Implementation Cost	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation
Context Matters Reporting Template	Qualitative	Reporting Template	English	Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting	Acceptability, Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Fidelity, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Penetration, Reach, Sustainment		Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS)	Quantitative	Template/Worksheet	English	Cost	Implementation Cost	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) Policy Survey	Quantitative	Survey	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Fit Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change	Acceptability, Adoption		Pre-Implementation
Ethnographic Assessment of Partner Engagement	Qualitative	Observation Guide Ethnographic Assessment	English	Engagement	Acceptability, Implementation, Reach	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Awareness Readiness	Adoption		Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)	Quantitative	Survey	English, German	Acceptability/feasibility	Feasibility	Yes	Pre-Implementation
Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) Adaptation Tracking Instrument	Quantitative	Survey	English	Strategies	Adaptation, Implementation, Sustainment	Yes	Implementation
Glisson’s Organizational Social Context (OSC)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Context – Inner setting Engagement Readiness	Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness		Implementation, Sustainment
Goodman’s Level of Institutionalization	Quantitative	Survey	English	Adoption	Adoption, Penetration, Sustainment		Sustainment
Hall’s Levels of Use Scale	Qualitative, Quantitative	Individual Interview	English	Adoption Awareness Champion/field agent Identification	Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Penetration		Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)	Quantitative	Template/Worksheet	English	Adaptation and evolution Complexity Context – Inner setting Evaluation Innovation characteristics Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change Strategies			Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Champion/field agent Context – Inner setting Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Stakeholders	Implementation
Implementation Strategy Usability Scale	Qualitative	Survey	Spanish	Acceptability/feasibility Adaptation and evolution Implementation Strategies Sustainability Patient/target audience characteristics and needs	Implementation		Implementation
integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) Interview Guide	Qualitative	Individual Interview	English	Adaptation and evolution Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Barriers and facilitators Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Patient/target audience characteristics and needs Strategies	Adaptation, Adoption, Fidelity, Implementation		Implementation
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)	Quantitative	Survey	English, German	Acceptability/feasibility	Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility	Yes	Implementation
Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)	Quantitative	Survey	English, French	Adaptation and evolution Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Adoption Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Fidelity Implementation Sustainability Reach Readiness	Acceptability, Adaptation, Adoption, Effectiveness, Fidelity, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Reach, Sustainment		Pre-Implementation, Implementation
Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool	Qualitative, Quantitative	Periodic Reflection	English, Spanish	Acceptability/feasibility Adaptation and evolution Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Barriers and facilitators Communication Complexity Context – Inner setting Cost Health Equity Innovation characteristics Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Sustainability Outcomes – Health/QOL/Satisfaction/Clinical Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change Patient/target audience characteristics and needs Readiness Stakeholders	Adoption, Effectiveness, Implementation, Reach, Sustainment	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Landry’s Knowledge Utilization Scale among Policymakers	Quantitative	Periodic Reflection	English	Barriers and facilitators Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Knowledge Transfer and Utilization	Adoption, Feasibility, Fidelity
Local Wellness Policy Implementation Checklist	Quantitative	Survey	English	Champion/field agent Communication channels Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Engagement Implementation Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Outcomes – Implementation Reach Stakeholders Strategies	Adoption, Implementation		Pre-Implementation, Implementation
Local Wellness Policy Survey	Quantitative	Survey	English	Process Pre-implementation Development of an Intervention	Acceptability		Pre-Implementation
Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Adaptation and evolution Dose Outcomes – Implementation	Adaptation, Implementation		Implementation
Normalization Process Theory Interview Guide	Qualitative	Individual Interview	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Adaptation and evolution Champion/field agent Compatibility Context – Inner setting Evaluation Fit Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Implementation Stakeholders Sustainability	Acceptability, Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Fidelity, Implementation, Sustainment		Implementation, Sustainment
Normalization Process Theory Questionnaire (NoMAD)	Quantitative	Survey	English, Swedish	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Awareness Context – Inner setting Engagement Strategies	Sustainment
Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)	Quantitative	Survey	English, French, Spanish, Albanian, Danish, Dutch, German, Italian	Acceptability/feasibility Readiness	Feasibility		Pre-Implementation
Partnership/Synergy Assessment Tool	Quantitative	Survey	English	Barriers and facilitators Champion/field agent Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Engagement Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Knowledge Transfer and Utilization Evaluation Reach Stakeholders Strategies	Acceptability, Adaptation, Implementation		Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Policy Coalition Evaluation Tool (PCET)	Qualitative	Documentation Guide	English	Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Fit Identification Implementation Innovation characteristics Sustainability Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change Process Stakeholders	Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Implementation, Sustainment		Implementation, Sustainment
Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) Contextual Survey Instrument (PCSI)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Adoption Barriers and facilitators Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Fit Implementation Pre-implementation Readiness	Acceptability, Adaptation, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Implementation, Sustainment		Pre-Implementation
Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) Interview Guide	Qualitative	Individual Interview	English	Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Evaluation Patient/target audience characteristics and needs Pre-implementation Stakeholders Sustainability	Adoption, Sustainment		Pre-Implementation, Implementation
Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)	Quantitative	Survey	English, Spanish	Adaptation and evolution Communication Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Dissemination Engagement Evaluation	Adaptation, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Sustainment		Sustainment
Program Sustainability Index	Quantitative	Survey	English	Sustainability	Sustainment		Sustainment
Provider REport of Sustainment Scale (PRESS)	Quantitative	Survey	English		Sustainment		Sustainment
Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) Protocol, Activity, and Interview Prompt Guide	Qualitative	Individual Interview Observation Guide	English	Barriers and facilitators Champion/field agent Communication Communication channels Compatibility Complexity Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Dissemination Fidelity Evaluation Health Equity Innovation characteristics Patient/target audience characteristics and needs Reach Stakeholders	Acceptability, Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Fidelity, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Penetration, Reach, Sustainment	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) Summary Template	Qualitative	Worksheet	English	Barriers and facilitators Champion/field agent Communication Communication channels Compatibility Complexity Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Dissemination Fidelity Evaluation Health Equity Innovation characteristics Patient/target audience characteristics and needs Reach Stakeholders	Acceptability, Adaptation, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Fidelity, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Penetration, Reach, Sustainment	Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Readiness for Recovery and Resiliency – Interview Guide	Qualitative	Focus Group Interview Individual Interview	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Barriers and facilitators Champion/field agent Communication Communication channels Compatibility Complexity Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Implementation Innovation characteristics Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Observability Pre-implementation Readiness	Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Implementation	Yes	Pre-Implementation
Readiness Thinking Tool – Observation Guide	Qualitative	Observation Guide	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Barriers and facilitators Champion/field agent Communication Communication channels Compatibility Complexity Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Implementation Innovation characteristics Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Observability Pre-implementation Readiness	Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Implementation	Yes	Pre-Implementation
Readiness Thinking Tool – Survey	Quantitative	Survey	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Barriers and facilitators Champion/field agent Communication Communication channels Compatibility Complexity Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Implementation Innovation characteristics Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis Observability Pre-implementation Readiness	Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Feasibility, Implementation	Yes	Pre-Implementation
Rehabilitation Policy Questionnaire	Qualitative, Quantitative	Survey	English	Barriers and facilitators Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Innovation characteristics Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics	Implementation		Implementation
Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Engagement Health Equity Stakeholders		Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST) – 9 item	Quantitative	Survey	English	Engagement Health Equity Stakeholders		Yes	Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
Rutten’s Health Policy Questionnaire	Qualitative	Survey	English	Context – Outer setting Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change			Implementation, Sustainment
Short Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Adaptation and evolution Communication Context Context – Inner setting Context – Outer setting Cost Dissemination Engagement Evaluation	Adaptation, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Sustainment		Sustainment
Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)	Qualitative, Quantitative	Undisclosed online tool	English	Engagement Acceptability/feasibility Readiness Context – Inner setting Stakeholders Fidelity Strategies Evaluation Sustainability	Acceptability, Fidelity, Implementation, Implementation Cost, Sustainment		Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment
User Engagement Scale (UES)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Engagement
User Engagement Scale (UES) – Short	Quantitative	Survey	English	Engagement
Van Schaik’s Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)	Quantitative	Survey	English	Acceptability/feasibility Adoption Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics Compatibility	Adoption, Appropriateness, Penetration		Implementation, Sustainment

Assessment Instrument Characteristics

Characteristic Title	Characteristic Description	Response options	Domain
Brief Description	Brief summary description of assessment instrument	Open Text	General Characteristics
Citing Literature - Development/Original	Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument	Open Text	General Characteristics
Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application	Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument	Open Text	General Characteristics
Website	Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument	Open Text	General Characteristics
Instrument and/or related documentation	Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each	Open Text	General Characteristics
Version	Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument	Open Text	General Characteristics
Qualitative/Quantitative	The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data	Multi Select Qualitative Quantitative See Values	Summary Statistics
Type of Instrument	The type of the assessment instrument	Multi Select Checklist Documentation Guide EMR Form Ethnographic Assessment Focus Group Interview Individual Interview Observation Guide Periodic Reflection Reporting Tempate Reporting Template Survey Template/Worksheet Undisclosed online tool Worksheet See Values	Summary Statistics
Levels of Data Collection	The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data	Multi Select Community Implementer Individual (Patient, Community Member) Organizational Policy System See Values	Intended Focus
Language Availability	Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available	Multi Select Albanian Chinese Danish Dutch English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish Swedish See Values	Summary Statistics
Constructs Assessed	Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)	Relationship	Implementation Science Considerations
Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant	The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed	Relationship	Implementation Science Considerations
Implementation Outcomes	The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes	Multi Select Acceptability Adaptation Adoption Appropriateness Effectiveness Feasibility Fidelity Implementation Implementation Cost Penetration Reach Sustainment See Values	Implementation Science Considerations
Implementation Strategies	The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument	Multi Select Access new funding Adapt and tailor to context Alter incentive/allowance structures Alter patient/consumer fees Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators Audit and provide feedback Build a coalition Capture and share local knowledge Change infrastructure Change physical structure and equipment Change service sites Conduct educational meetings Conduct educational outreach visits Conduct local consensus discussions Conduct local needs assessment Conduct ongoing training Create a learning collaborative Create or change credentialing and/or licensure standards Develop a formal implementation blueprint Develop academic partnerships Develop educational materials Develop implementation blueprint Develop resource sharing agreements Develop stakeholder inter-relationships Develop stakeholder interrelationships Distribute educational materials Engage consumers Identify and prepare champions Identify early adopters Inform local opinion leaders Make billing easier Make training dynamic Mandate change Model and simulate change Not Found Obtain and use patients/consumers and family feedback Obtain formal commitments Organize clinician implementation team meetings Place innovation on fee for service lists/formularies Prepare patients/consumers to be active participants Promote adaptability Promote network weaving Provide clinical supervision Provide interactive assistance Provide local technical assistance Provide ongoing consultation Purposely reexamine the implementation Recruite, designate, and train for leadership Revise professional roles Shadow other experts Stage implementation scale up Support clinicians Tailor strategies Train and educate stakeholders Use advisory boards and workgroups Use an implementation advisor Use capitated payments Use data experts Use data warehousing techniques Use evaluative and iterative strategies Use mass media Use of evaluative and iterative strategies Use other payment schemes Use train-the-trainer strategies Utilize financial strategies Visit other sites Work with educational institutions See Values	Implementation Science Considerations
Intended Priority Population	Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument	Multi Select Administrator Clinician Community Members/Patients Employer Public Health Practitioner Researcher/Evaluator Teacher/Trainer See Values	Intended Focus
Intended Priority Setting	Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used	Multi Select Clinical Inpatient Clinical Outpatient Community Organization Public Health Agency Residential Care School Workplace See Values	Intended Focus
Phase of Implementation Process	Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used	Multi Select Implementation Pre-Implementation Sustainment See Values	Implementation Science Considerations
Policy	Assessment instrument is relevant to policy	Multi Select Clinical Practice Healthcare Financing/Reimbursement Public (Laws, Regulations) See Values	Intended Focus
Equity Relevant	Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component	Multi Select Yes See Values	Intended Focus
Uses Secondary data	Assessment instrument relies on a secondary data source	Multi Select Yes See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Time to Administer	The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument	Open Text	Pragmatic Characteristics
Number of Items	Number of items in the assessment instrument	Open Text	Summary Statistics
Subscale Information	Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales	Open Text	Summary Statistics
Scoring	The assessment instrument produces a composite score	Multi Select No Yes See Values	Psychometric Properties
Norms	Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size	Multi Select Yes See Values	Psychometric Properties
Responsiveness	The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).	Multi Select Yes See Values	Psychometric Properties
Cost	Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)	Multi Select Cost Free See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Literacy	Readability of the items reported on.	Multi Select Yes See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Interpretation	Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.	Multi Select No Yes See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Training	Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported	Multi Select No Yes See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Resources Required to Administer	Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)	Multi Select High None/Low See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
User Guidance	Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data	Multi Select Guidance for Action/Decision Guidance to Administer Guidance to Analyze Guidance to Interpret See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Obtrusiveness	Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)	Multi Select High: Observation and syncronous collection of data Low: Automated collection of data or secondary data Medium: Asyncronous collection of data See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Interactivity	Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.	Multi Select Adaptive Instrument Generative Outcome See Values	Pragmatic Characteristics
Related Instruments	Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.	Relationship	General Characteristics
Validity	The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.	Multi Select Concurrent Validity (Definition) Convergent Validity (Definition) Cross-Cultural Validity (Definition) Discriminant Validity (Definition) Known Group Validity (Definition) Predictive Validity (Definition) Unspecified Validity See Values	Psychometric Properties
Reliability	The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.	Multi Select Yes See Values	Psychometric Properties
Factor Analysis	A statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.	Multi Select Yes See Values	Psychometric Properties

View by D&I Assessment Instruments

View by D&I Assessment Instruments

Assessment Instrument Characteristics

D&I Models Webtool

Explore Assessment Instruments:

Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data

Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument

Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)

Phase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used

Implementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes

Equity Relevant:
Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component

Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available

View by D&I Assessment Instruments

View by D&I Assessment Instruments

Assessment Instrument Characteristics

D&I Models Webtool

Explore Assessment Instruments:

Qualitative/Quantitative: The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data

Type of Instrument: The type of the assessment instrument

Constructs Assessed: Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)

Phase of Implementation Process: Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used

Implementation Outcomes: The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes

Equity Relevant: Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component

Language Availability: Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available

Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data

Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument

Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)

Phase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used

Implementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes

Equity Relevant:
Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component

Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available