« Back to Assessment Instruments
Qualitative/Quantitative:
Type of Instrument:
Number of Items:
46Subscale Information:
Awareness (2)
Reception (4)
Cognition (6)
Discussion (6)
Reference (4)
Effort (2)
Adoption (6)
Implementation (10)
Impact (4)
Additional Comments (1)
Deliberate Non-Use (1)Language Availability:
Brief Description:
Measures were developed to assess knowledge exchange outcomes. This project developed a practical and usable tool to measure the reach and uptake of disseminated innovations. The instrument itself facilitates an opportunity for knowledge exchange to occur between producers and adopters.Website:
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Skinner, K. (2007). Developing a tool to measure knowledge exchange outcomes. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 22(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.022.003Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Not FoundVersion:
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Not Found
Knowledge Exchange Outcomes Tool
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
- Quantitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
- Survey
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
46Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Awareness (2)Reception (4)
Cognition (6)
Discussion (6)
Reference (4)
Effort (2)
Adoption (6)
Implementation (10)
Impact (4)
Additional Comments (1)
Deliberate Non-Use (1)
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
- English
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Measures were developed to assess knowledge exchange outcomes. This project developed a practical and usable tool to measure the reach and uptake of disseminated innovations. The instrument itself facilitates an opportunity for knowledge exchange to occur between producers and adopters.Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Skinner, K. (2007). Developing a tool to measure knowledge exchange outcomes. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 22(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.022.003Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Not FoundVersion:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Not FoundImplementation Science Considerations
- ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
- Active Implementation Framework
- Advancing health disparities research within the health care system
- Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
- Blueprint for Dissemination
- CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
- Caledonian Practice Development Model
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
- Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework
- Coordinated Implementation Model
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
- Diffusion of Innovation
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
- EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
- EQ-DI Framework
- Effective Dissemination Strategies
- Evidence Integration Triangle
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Analyzing Adoption of Complex Health Innovations
- Framework for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Policy
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- Framework for Knowledge Translation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for Translating Evidence into Action
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Generic Implementation Framework
- Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Research Center Framework
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Intervention Mapping
- Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- Linking Systems Framework
- Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
- Model for Improving the Dissemination of Nursing Research
- Model for Locally Based Research Transfer Development
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- OutPatient Treatment in Ontario Services (OPTIONS) Model
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2
- Precede-Proceed Model
- Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
- Proctor's Implementation Outcomes
- Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)
- Pronovost's 4E's Process Theory
- RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
- RE-AIM 1.0 Framework
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Real-World Dissemination
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Research Development Dissemination and Utilization Framework
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- Stetler Model of Research Utilization
- Sticky Knowledge
- Technology Transfer Model
- The SPIRIT Action Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework
- Weiner organizational readiness
- conNECT Framework
- Adoption
- Implementation
- Reach
- Engage consumers
- Use evaluative and iterative strategies
- Implementation
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
Implementation Strategies:
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Phase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Intended Focus
- Implementer
- Clinician
- Public Health Practitioner
- Clinical Outpatient
- Clinical Inpatient
- Residential Care
- Community Organization
- Public Health Agency
- Workplace
Levels of Data Collection:
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
Intended Priority Population:
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Intended Priority Setting:
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Policy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Focus:
Not Found
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
NoThe assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
Not FoundMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
Not FoundThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
Not FoundThe extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.
Reliability:
Not FoundThe extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.
Factor Analysis:
Not FoundA statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.
Pragmatic Properties
- Guidance to Administer
- Guidance to Interpret
- Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
Time to Administer:
Not FoundThe amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
FreeCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)
Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not FoundExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not FoundExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Obtrusiveness:
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
Interactivity:
Not FoundData collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.