« Back to Assessment Instruments
Qualitative/Quantitative:
Type of Instrument:
Number of Items:
30Subscale Information:
Previous History of Change (3)
Plans for continuous organizational refinement (3)
Ability to initiate and sustain that change (10)
Strategies for Improving Depression Care (14)Language Availability:
Brief Description:
The Change Process Capability Questionnaire is a survey tool for assessing medical group capability to improve care.Website:
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Not FoundCiting Literature - Development/Original:
Solberg, L. I., Asche, S. E., Margolis, K. L., & Whitebird, R. R. (2008). Measuring an organization's ability to manage change: the change process capability questionnaire and its use for improving depression care. American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 23(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608314942Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Not FoundVersion:
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Not Found
The Change Process Capability Questionnaire
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
- Quantitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
- Survey
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
30Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Previous History of Change (3)Plans for continuous organizational refinement (3)
Ability to initiate and sustain that change (10)
Strategies for Improving Depression Care (14)
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
- English
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
The Change Process Capability Questionnaire is a survey tool for assessing medical group capability to improve care.Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Not FoundCiting Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Solberg, L. I., Asche, S. E., Margolis, K. L., & Whitebird, R. R. (2008). Measuring an organization's ability to manage change: the change process capability questionnaire and its use for improving depression care. American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 23(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608314942Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Not FoundVersion:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Not FoundImplementation Science Considerations
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- Advancing health disparities research within the health care system
- Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
- Behaviour Change Wheel
- Blueprint for Dissemination
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework
- Coordinated Implementation Model
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
- Dynamic Sustainability Framework
- EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
- EQ-DI Framework
- Effective Dissemination Strategies
- Evidence Integration Triangle
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Analyzing Adoption of Complex Health Innovations
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- Framework for Knowledge Translation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Generic Implementation Framework
- Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Research Center Framework
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interactive Systems Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2
- Precede-Proceed Model
- Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
- Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)
- Push-Pull Capacity Model
- RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Real-World Dissemination
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- The SPIRIT Action Framework
- Theoretical Domains Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Weiner organizational readiness
- conNECT Framework
- Implementation
- Change infrastructure
- Use of evaluative and iterative strategies
- Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators
- Capture and share local knowledge
- Identify and prepare champions
- Develop implementation blueprint
- Pre-Implementation
- Implementation
- Sustainment
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
Implementation Strategies:
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Phase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Intended Focus
- Implementer
- Organizational
- Clinician
- Administrator
- Public Health Practitioner
- Clinical Outpatient
- Clinical Inpatient
- Residential Care
- Public Health Agency
Levels of Data Collection:
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
Intended Priority Population:
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Intended Priority Setting:
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Policy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Focus:
Not Found
Psychometric Properties
- Discriminant Validity
- Convergent Validity
- Internal Consistency
Scoring:
YesThe assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
Not FoundMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
Not FoundThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.
Reliability:
The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.
Factor Analysis:
Not FoundA statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.
Pragmatic Properties
- Guidance to Administer
- Guidance to Interpret
- Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
Time to Administer:
Not FoundThe amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
FreeCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)
Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not FoundExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not FoundExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Obtrusiveness:
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
Interactivity:
Not FoundData collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.