Therapy Process Observational Coding Systems for Child Psychotherapy- Revised Strategies Scale (TPOCS-Revised Strategies Scale)

Constructs Assessed:

Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)

• Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis
• Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change

Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:

The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed

• ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
• Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
• CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
• Caledonian Practice Development Model
• Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
• Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings
• Conceptual Framework For The Comparative Analysis of Policy Change
• Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
• Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
• Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
• Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN)
• Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
• Coordinated Implementation Model
• Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
• Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
• Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
• Dynamic Sustainability Framework
• Effective Dissemination Strategies
• Evidence Integration Triangle
• Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
• Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
• Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
• Framework for Knowledge Translation
• Framework for Translating Evidence into Action
• Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
• Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
• General theory of implementation
• Health Equity Implementation Framework
• Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
• Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
• Knowledge Exchange Framework
• Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
• Model for Predictors of Adoption
• Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
• Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
• Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
• Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)
• RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
• Research Development Dissemination and Utilization Framework
• Stetler Model of Research Utilization
• Technology Transfer Model
• The SPIRIT Action Framework
• Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework

Implementation Outcomes:

The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes

• Fidelity

Implementation Strategies:

The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument

• Use of evaluative and iterative strategies
• Capture and share local knowledge

Phase of Implementation Process:

Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used

• Implementation
• Sustainment

Levels of Data Collection:

The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data

• Individual (Patient, Community Member)
• Implementer

Intended Priority Population:

Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument

• Community Members/Patients
• Researcher/Evaluator
• Clinician
• Public Health Practitioner

Intended Priority Setting:

Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used

• Clinical Outpatient
• Clinical Inpatient
• Residential Care
• Community Organization
• Public Health Agency
• Workplace

Policy:

Assessment instrument is relevant to policy

Equity Focus:

Scoring:

The assessment instrument produces a composite score

Norms:

Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size

Responsiveness:

The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).

Validity:

The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.

• Discriminant Validity

Reliability:

The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.

• Inter-Rater Reliability

Factor Analysis:

A statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.

Time to Administer:

The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument

Secondary Data:

Cost:

Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)

Literacy:

Readability of the items reported on.

Interpretation:

Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.

Training:

Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported

Resources Required to Administer:

Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)

User Guidance:

Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data

• Guidance to Administer

Obtrusiveness:

Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)

• Medium: Asyncronous collection of data

Interactivity:

Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.