« Back to Assessment Instruments
Qualitative/Quantitative:
Type of Instrument:
Number of Items:
75Subscale Information:
Module 1: Brief Description of the EBP, Implementation strategy and modifications (4)
Module 2: What is Modified? (9)
Module 3: What is the NATURE of the content, evaluation, or training modification? (18)
Module 4: What is the RATIONALE for the modification? (15)
Module 5: WHEN is the modification initiated, and is it PLANNED? (9)
Module 6: WHO participated in the decision to modify? (10)
Module 7: How WIDESPREAD is the modification? (9)Language Availability:
Brief Description:
FRAME-IS (FRAMEwork for documenting modifications to Implementation Strategies in healthcare) Adaptation Tracking Instrument is a flexible, practical tool for documenting modifications to implementation strategies.Website:
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Miller, C. J., Barnett, M. L., Baumann, A. A., Gutner, C. A., & Wiltsey-Stirman, S. (2021). The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implementation science : IS, 16(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3. PMID: 33827716; PMCID: PMC8024675.Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Lane, C., Wolfenden, L., Hall, A. et al. Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 19, 106 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6. PMID: 35987776 PMCID: PMC9392334.
Hurwitz, S., Garman-McClaine, B., & Carlock, K. (2022). Special education for students with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic: “Each day brings new challenges”. Autism, 26(4), 889-899. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211035935. PMID: 34344221.Version:
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Not Found
Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) Adaptation Tracking Instrument
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
- Quantitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
- Survey
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
75Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Module 1: Brief Description of the EBP, Implementation strategy and modifications (4)Module 2: What is Modified? (9)
Module 3: What is the NATURE of the content, evaluation, or training modification? (18)
Module 4: What is the RATIONALE for the modification? (15)
Module 5: WHEN is the modification initiated, and is it PLANNED? (9)
Module 6: WHO participated in the decision to modify? (10)
Module 7: How WIDESPREAD is the modification? (9)
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
- English
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
FRAME-IS (FRAMEwork for documenting modifications to Implementation Strategies in healthcare) Adaptation Tracking Instrument is a flexible, practical tool for documenting modifications to implementation strategies.Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Miller, C. J., Barnett, M. L., Baumann, A. A., Gutner, C. A., & Wiltsey-Stirman, S. (2021). The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implementation science : IS, 16(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3. PMID: 33827716; PMCID: PMC8024675.Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Lane, C., Wolfenden, L., Hall, A. et al. Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 19, 106 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6. PMID: 35987776 PMCID: PMC9392334.Hurwitz, S., Garman-McClaine, B., & Carlock, K. (2022). Special education for students with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic: “Each day brings new challenges”. Autism, 26(4), 889-899. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211035935. PMID: 34344221.
Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Not FoundImplementation Science Considerations
- Active Implementation Framework
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- Behaviour Change Wheel
- Blueprint for Dissemination
- Caledonian Practice Development Model
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework For The Comparative Analysis of Policy Change
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization
- Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Convergent Diffusion and Social Marketing Approach for Dissemination
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
- EQ-DI Framework
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Generic Implementation Framework
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Interactive Systems Framework
- Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
- Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- Theoretical Domains Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Adaptation
- Implementation
- Sustainment
- Adapt and tailor to context
- Provide interactive assistance
- Use of evaluative and iterative strategies
- Implementation
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessedImplementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomesImplementation Strategies:
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrumentPhase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Intended Focus
- Implementer
- Researcher/Evaluator
- Clinical Outpatient
- Clinical Inpatient
- Residential Care
- Community Organization
- Public Health Agency
- School
- Workplace
Levels of Data Collection:
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects dataIntended Priority Population:
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrumentIntended Priority Setting:
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is usedPolicy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policyEquity Relevant:
YesAssessment instrument includes at least one equity-relevant component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
Not FoundThe assessment instrument produces a composite scoreNorms:
Not FoundMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample sizeResponsiveness:
Not FoundThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).Validity:
Not FoundThe extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.Reliability:
Not FoundThe extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.Factor Analysis:
Not FoundA statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.
Pragmatic Properties
- Guidance to Administer
- Guidance to Analyze
- Guidance to Interpret
- Guidance for Action/Decision
- Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
Time to Administer:
Not FoundThe amount of time required to complete the assessment instrumentUses Secondary Data:
YesAssessment instrument relies on a secondary data sourceCost:
FreeCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.Interpretation:
YesExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.Training:
YesExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reportedResources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)User Guidance:
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use dataObtrusiveness:
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)Interactivity:
Not FoundData collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.