« Back to Assessment Instruments
Qualitative/Quantitative:
Type of Instrument:
Number of Items:
Not FoundSubscale Information:
No SubscalesLanguage Availability:
Brief Description:
Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS) is a methodology to document and characterize implementation strategies use over time.Website:
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Smith, J. D., Norton, W. E., Mitchell, S. A., Cronin, C., Hassett, M. J., Ridgeway, J. L., Garcia, S. F., Osarogiagbon, R. U., Dizon, D. S., Austin, J. D., Battestilli, W., Richardson, J. E., Tesch, N. K., Cella, D., Cheville, A. L., DiMartino, L. D., & IMPACT Consortium (2023). The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS): feasibility, usability, and pilot testing of a novel method. Implementation science communications, 4(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00529-w. PMID: 38017582; PMCID: PMC10683230.Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Smith, J. D., Merle, J. L., Webster, K. A., Cahue, S., Penedo, F. J., & Garcia, S. F. (2022). Tracking dynamic changes in implementation strategies over time within a hybrid type 2 trial of an electronic patient-reported oncology symptom and needs monitoring program. Frontiers in health services, 2, 983217. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.983217. PMID: 36925901 PMCID: PMC10012686.Version:
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Not Found
Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
- Quantitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
- Survey
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
Not FoundSubscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
No SubscalesLanguage Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
- English
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS) is a methodology to document and characterize implementation strategies use over time.Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Not FoundInstrument and/or related documentation:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Smith, J. D., Norton, W. E., Mitchell, S. A., Cronin, C., Hassett, M. J., Ridgeway, J. L., Garcia, S. F., Osarogiagbon, R. U., Dizon, D. S., Austin, J. D., Battestilli, W., Richardson, J. E., Tesch, N. K., Cella, D., Cheville, A. L., DiMartino, L. D., & IMPACT Consortium (2023). The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS): feasibility, usability, and pilot testing of a novel method. Implementation science communications, 4(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00529-w. PMID: 38017582; PMCID: PMC10683230.Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Smith, J. D., Merle, J. L., Webster, K. A., Cahue, S., Penedo, F. J., & Garcia, S. F. (2022). Tracking dynamic changes in implementation strategies over time within a hybrid type 2 trial of an electronic patient-reported oncology symptom and needs monitoring program. Frontiers in health services, 2, 983217. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.983217. PMID: 36925901 PMCID: PMC10012686.Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instruments:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Not FoundImplementation Science Considerations
- Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dynamic Sustainability Framework
- EQ-DI Framework
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- General theory of implementation
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Intervention Mapping
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Stetler Model of Research Utilization
- Stirman framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions
- Technology Transfer Model
- The SPIRIT Action Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework
- Adaptation
- Implementation
- Adapt and tailor to context
- Use of evaluative and iterative strategies
- Implementation
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessedImplementation Outcomes:
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomesImplementation Strategies:
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrumentPhase of Implementation Process:
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Intended Focus
- Organizational
- System
- Researcher/Evaluator
- Clinical Outpatient
- Clinical Inpatient
Levels of Data Collection:
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects dataIntended Priority Population:
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrumentIntended Priority Setting:
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is usedPolicy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policyEquity Focus:
Not Found
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
Not FoundThe assessment instrument produces a composite scoreNorms:
Not FoundMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample sizeResponsiveness:
Not FoundThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).Validity:
Not FoundThe extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.Reliability:
Not FoundThe extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.Factor Analysis:
Not FoundA statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.
Pragmatic Properties
- Low: Automated collection of data or secondary data
- Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
Time to Administer:
Not FoundThe amount of time required to complete the assessment instrumentSecondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
Not FoundCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some instruments might require login.)Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.Interpretation:
Not FoundExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.Training:
Not FoundExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reportedResources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)User Guidance:
Not FoundGuides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use dataObtrusiveness:
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)Interactivity:
Not FoundData collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.