Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics
Number of Models:
The number of models that include elements aligned with the given construct.
38 
The number of models that include elements aligned with the given construct.
Elements:
Components abstracted from each model and aligned with the given construct.
Ability
Components abstracted from each model and aligned with the given construct.
Adopter audiences
Adopter training and support
Adult: Parent - attitudes
Adult: Parent - skills
Adult: Teacher - attitudes
Adult: Teacher - skills
Attitudes
Audience
Behavioral Regulation
Behaviors
Beliefs
Beliefs about capabilities
Beliefs about Consequences
Capability
Capability - Physical
Capability - Psychological
Change Agents
Characteristics of Individuals
Clear definition of objectives by decision-maker
Clients
Clinical Experience
Competence
Cosmopolitanism
Critical Reflection by Adopters
Decision-maker interest
Decision-maker style
Decision-maker's participation
Eligibility
Emotion
Experience
Expertise
Goals
Implementers
Individual
Individual adopter characteristics
Individual characteristics
Individual Factors
Individual Factors influencing implementation
Individual Identification with Organization
Individual intentions
Individual level
Individual Stage of Change
Intentions
Interpersonal Skills
Key messengers
Knowledge and beliefs
Memory, attention and decision processes
Motivation - automatic
Motivation to change
Motivation- reflective
Norms & Attitudes
Opportunity - Physical
Opportunity - Social
Optimism
Other Personal Attributes
Peer Pressure
Personal
Perspectives and Frameworks
Potential Adopters
Practice
Professional training
Provider Factors
Psychosocial Factors
Research interest and expertise
Self-efficacy
Sill Development
Skill Assessment
Skills
Social/professional role and identity
User group
Definition:
The definition of the construct.
The characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of individuals within an adopting organization include position in the organization, education, individual concerns and motivations and may determine the uptake and use of an innovation. Rogers classifies the individual adopters according to their degree of innovativeness into five categories: (1) innovators, (2) early adopters, (3-4) early and late majority, and (5) laggards.
The definition of the construct.
Related Models:
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
- Behaviour Change Wheel
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0
- Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework
- Coordinated Implementation Model
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
- Effective Dissemination Strategies
- EQ-DI Framework
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Knowledge Translation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interactive Systems Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2
- Process Model of Implementation from a Policy Perspective Depicting the Process at One Policy Level
- RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- The SPIRIT Action Framework
- Theoretical Domains Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
Assessment Instruments:
External link to measures on the GEM site for the given construct.
External link to measures on the GEM site for the given construct.
- AHRQ Digital Health Equity Framework
- Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide (Zhao)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide Webtool
- integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) Interview Guide
- Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
- Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) Contextual Survey Instrument (PCSI)
- Rehabilitation Policy Questionnaire
- Van Schaik's Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)