Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
D and/or I:
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
I-Only 
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
Socio-Ecological Levels:
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
- Individual
- Organization
- System
Number of Times Cited:
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
6
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
Field of Origin:
The field of study in which the model originated.
Dissemination and Implementation
The field of study in which the model originated.
Practitioner/Researcher:
Whether the model is for the use of practitioners and/or researchers.
Practitioner and Researcher
Whether the model is for the use of practitioners and/or researchers.
Rating:
These are ratings given by users of the site.
These are ratings given by users of the site.
Constructs:
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
- Acceptability/feasibility
- Adaptation and evolution
- Adopter/implementer/decision maker characteristics
- Awareness
- Development of an Intervention
- Goals
- Barriers and facilitators
- Context – Inner setting
- Context – Outer setting
- Cost
- Engagement
- Evaluation
- Fidelity
- Identification
- Innovation characteristics
- Knowledge and Knowledge Synthesis
- Readiness
- Sustainability
- Outcomes – Quality Improvement/Practice or Policy Change
- Process
- Relative advantage
- Stakeholders
- Strategies
Assessment Instruments:
Name of the assessment developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Name of the assessment developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
- AHRQ Digital Health Equity Framework
- Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
- CFIR Interview Guide (Lam)
- CFIR Interview Guide (Zhao)
- CFIR Interview Guide Webtool
- Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT)
- Context Matters Reporting Template
- Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS)
- Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) Policy Survey
- Ethnographic Assessment of Partner Engagement
- Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)
- FRAME-IS Adaptation Tracking Instrument
- Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
- Glisson's Organizational Social Context (OSC)
- Hall's Levels of Use Scale
- Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
- Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)
- Implementation Strategy Usability Scale
- Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
- Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
- Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool
- Landry's Knowledge Utilization Scale among Policymakers
- Local Wellness Policy Implementation Checklist
- Local Wellness Policy Survey
- Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)
- Normalization Process Theory Interview Guide
- Normalization Process Theory Questionnaire (NoMAD)
- Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)
- PRISM Contextual Survey Instrument (PCSI)
- Partnership/Synergy Assessment Tool
- Policy Coalition Evaluation Tool (PCET)
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model Interview Guide
- Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)
- Program Sustainability Index
- RAPICE Protocol, Activity, and Interview Prompt Guide
- RAPICE Summary Template
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Observation Guide
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Survey
- Readiness for Recovery and Resiliency - Interview Guide
- Rehabilitation Policy Questionnaire
- Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST)
- Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST) - 9 item
- Rutten’s Health Policy Questionnaire
- Short Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)
- Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)
- User Engagement Scale (UES)
- User Engagement Scale (UES) - Short
- Van Schaik's Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
- i-PARiHS Interview Guide
Citations:
The original publication(s) of the model.
Grimshaw JM, Patey AM, Kirkham KR, et al. De-implementing wisely: developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care. BMJ Quality & Safety 2020;29:409-417.
The original publication(s) of the model.
Examples:
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
Kastner et al. An Idea Worth Sustaining: Evaluation of the sustainability potential of Choosing Wisely across Ontario Community Hospitals and Family Health Teams. 27 Aug. 2020 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-63468/v1 Website: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-63468/v1
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.