Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
D and/or I:
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
I-Only 
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
Socio-Ecological Levels:
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
- Individual
- Organization
- Community
- System
Number of Times Cited:
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
541
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
Figure:
Field of Origin:
The field of study in which the model originated.
Mental health
The field of study in which the model originated.
Practitioner/Researcher:
Whether the model is for the use of practitioners and/or researchers.
Researcher
Whether the model is for the use of practitioners and/or researchers.
Rating:
These are ratings given by users of the site.
These are ratings given by users of the site.
Constructs:
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Assessment Instruments:
Name of the assessment developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Name of the assessment developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
- AHRQ Digital Health Equity Framework
- CFIR Interview Guide (Lam)
- CFIR Interview Guide (Zhao)
- CFIR Interview Guide Webtool
- Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT)
- Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) Policy Survey
- FRAME-IS Adaptation Tracking Instrument
- Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
- Implementation Strategy Usability Scale
- Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
- Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool
- Local Wellness Policy Implementation Checklist
- Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)
- Normalization Process Theory Interview Guide
- Normalization Process Theory Questionnaire (NoMAD)
- Partnership/Synergy Assessment Tool
- Policy Coalition Evaluation Tool (PCET)
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model Interview Guide
- Program Sustainability Index
- RAPICE Protocol, Activity, and Interview Prompt Guide
- RAPICE Summary Template
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Observation Guide
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Survey
- Readiness for Recovery and Resiliency - Interview Guide
- Rehabilitation Policy Questionnaire
- Rutten’s Health Policy Questionnaire
- Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)
- i-PARiHS Interview Guide
Citations:
The original publication(s) of the model.
Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Admin Policy Mental Health 2009;36(1):24–34.
The original publication(s) of the model.
Examples:
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
Burn, Anne-Marie et al. “Evaluating the CYP-IAPT transformation of child and adolescent mental health services in Cambridgeshire, UK: a qualitative implementation study.” Implementation Science Communications vol. 1 89. 14 Oct. 2020, doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00078-6
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
McGinty EE, Murphy KA, Dalcin AT, Stuart EA, Wang NY, Dickerson F, Gudzune K, Jerome G, Thompson D, Cullen BA, Gennusa J, Kilbourne AM, Daumit GL. A Model for Advancing Scale-Up of Complex Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: the ALACRITY Center for Health and Longevity in Mental Illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06137-x.
Murphy A, Rhodes AG, Taxman FS. Adaptability of contingency management in justice settings: survey findings on attitudes toward using rewards. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;43(2):168-177. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.004
Tabak RG, Dsouza N, Schwarz CD, Quinn K, Kristen P, Haire-Joshu D. A formative study to understand perspectives of families eligible for a pediatric obesity program: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5466-x
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.