Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
D and/or I:
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
D-Only Socio-Ecological Levels:
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
- Organization
Number of Times Cited:
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
17 Field of Origin:
The field of study in which the model originated.
Workplace health and safety Practitioner/Researcher:
Whether the model is for the use of practitioners and/or researchers.
Practitioner Rating:
These are ratings given by users of the site.
Constructs:
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Assessment Instruments:
Name of the assessment developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
- Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide (Lam)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide (Zhao)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Interview Guide Webtool
- Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)
- Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) Adaptation Tracking Instrument
- Glisson's Organizational Social Context (OSC)
- Hall's Levels of Use Scale
- Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
- Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)
- Implementation Strategy Usability Scale
- Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
- Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool
- Landry's Knowledge Utilization Scale among Policymakers
- Local Wellness Policy Implementation Checklist
- Local Wellness Policy Survey
- Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)
- Normalization Process Theory Interview Guide
- Normalization Process Theory Questionnaire (NoMAD)
- Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)
- Partnership/Synergy Assessment Tool
- Policy Coalition Evaluation Tool (PCET)
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) Contextual Survey Instrument (PCSI)
- Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)
- Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) Protocol, Activity, and Interview Prompt Guide
- Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) Summary Template
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Observation Guide
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Survey
- Readiness for Recovery and Resiliency - Interview Guide
- Short Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)
- Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)
- integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) Interview Guide
Citations:
The original publication(s) of the model.
Kramer DM, Cole DC. Sustained, intensive engagement to promote health and safety knowledge transfer to and utilization by workplaces. Sci Commun 2003;25(1):56. Examples:
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
Allen, P., Sequeira, S., Jacob, R.R. et al. Promoting state health department evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention: a multi-phase dissemination study with a cluster randomized trial component. Implementation Sci 2013; 8, 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-141Kramer DM, Cole DC, Leithwood K. Doing knowledge transfer: engaging management and labor with research on employee health and safety. Bull Sci, Technol Soc 2004;24(4):316-30 doi:10.1177/0270467604267003
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.